You Can’t Take It With You: Part Three – Giving to Charity

As we continue our series on gifting strategies, we turn our focus to charitable giving. Charitable bequests offer a unique opportunity to make a real impact, honor or memorialize a loved one, enhance the value of your estate, demonstrate your values to your children and other heirs, and determine the legacy you leave behind. By planning your charitable contributions strategically, you can maximize the benefits for both the charity and you. Here are four short-term gifting strategies for charities:

1. Bunching

Bunching is a strategy where you consolidate multiple years’ worth of charitable contributions into a single year. This approach allows you to itemize deductions in the year you bunch your donations, potentially exceeding the standard deduction and maximizing your tax benefits.  If payments are significant, this strategy may offer you the ability to itemize every other year.

Pros:

  • Maximizes tax deductions by surpassing the standard deduction threshold
  • Flexibility in timing and amount of donations
  • Can plan donations around high-income years for greater tax savings

Cons:

  • Requires careful planning and timing
  • Benefits may vary depending on changes in tax laws
  • Potentially less consistent support for charities year-to-year

2. Gift of Appreciated Securities

Highly appreciated securities are those securities where the fair market value significantly exceeds the original purchase price or cost basis of the securities, resulting in a significant amount of capital gains upon the sale of such securities. Donating highly appreciated securities, such as stocks, bonds, or mutual funds, directly to a charity can be a tax-efficient way to give—may be even more tax-efficient than donating cash. By donating the securities, you avoid paying capital gains tax on the appreciation (as well as avoiding the 3.8% net investment tax), and you can deduct the fair market value of the securities on the date of the gift.

Pros:

  • Avoids capital gains tax on appreciated assets
  • Deduction based on the fair market value of the securities
  • Benefits both the donor and the charity

Cons:

  • May not be suitable for all donors, and not all charitable organizations have the capability to accept securities
  • Donation of closely held securities require a valuation and additional paperwork
  • Securities must be held for more than one year

3. Donor Advised Fund

A Donor Advised Fund (“DAF”) is a charitable giving vehicle hosted by a public charity that allows you to make a lump-sum charitable contribution, receive an immediate tax deduction, and then recommend grants to charitable organizations from the fund over time. DAFs offer flexibility in timing and can be used to support multiple charities.  As a bonus, at tax time you only need one charitable contribution statement from the DAF organization to provide to your tax preparer, regardless of the numerous charitable grants made from the DAF subsequent to the contribution.

Pros:

  • Immediate tax deduction upon contribution to the DAF
  • Flexibility to recommend grants over time
  • Can be invested for potential growth, increasing the charitable impact

Cons:

  • Administrative minimums and fees, along with investment management costs
  • Contributions to the DAF are irrevocable
  • Limited control once funds are contributed; must adhere to the sponsoring organization’s policies

4. Qualified Charitable Distribution

A Qualified Charitable Distribution (“QCD”) allows individuals aged 70½ or older to transfer up to $100,000 directly from their IRA to a qualified charity on an annual basis. This distribution counts towards the required minimum distribution (RMD) and is excluded from taxable income.  A QCD is in effect “deductible” even for someone who cannot itemize.  In other words, you, as the IRA owner, can satisfy your charitable gifts with a QCD, exclude the QCD from your income, and still take the standard deduction on your tax return.  Here are a few of the taxes and costs you may reduce or avoid by having a lower Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) as a result of satisfying your RMD with a QCD:  (i) 3.8% net investment tax kicks in when AGI is above certain levels; (ii) medical expenses (deductible if they exceed 7% of AGI); (iii) Social Security benefits may be wholly or mostly excludible from gross income based on AGI; (iv) Medicare premiums are higher for higher-income individuals (based on AGI for the tax year that is two years’ prior to the premium year in question); and (v) reduction in state income taxes, as most state income tax returns begin with your federal AGI.

Pros:

  • Reduces taxable income by excluding the distribution from income
  • Satisfies RMD requirements—provided that QCD is taken out first
  • Direct transfer simplifies the process

Cons:

  • Limited to individuals aged 70½ or older
  • Annual limit of $100,000 per individual
  • Must be transferred directly from the IRA to the charity to qualify

Conclusion

Charitable giving is a powerful way to make a lasting impact and shape your legacy. Whether you choose to bunch your donations, gift appreciated securities, utilize a Donor Advised Fund, or make a Qualified Charitable Distribution, each strategy offers unique benefits and considerations. By thoughtfully planning your charitable contributions, you can maximize the benefits for both the charities you support and yourself, ensuring that your generosity continues to make a difference for years to come. Consulting with a financial advisor and estate planning attorney can help you determine the best approach for your individual circumstances and philanthropic goals.

You Can’t Take It With You: Part Two – Giving to Children

Continuing from our previous discussion on education-specific gifting strategies, this article delves into four additional gifting strategies for your children. While outright gifts and intrafamily loans are relatively straightforward, Intentionally Defective Grantor Trusts (“IDGT”) and Spousal Lifetime Access Trusts (“SLAT”) are more advanced strategies that require careful planning and execution. Below we will explore each of these strategies, along with their respective advantages and disadvantages.

1. Outright Gifts

Outright gifts are perhaps the simplest way to transfer wealth to your children. You can give cash, stocks, real estate, or other assets directly to them. Each year, you can give up to the annual exclusion amount ($18,000 per recipient for 2024) without incurring gift tax or triggering the obligation to file a federal gift tax return. If you exceed this amount, you must file a federal gift tax return and the excess will count against your lifetime gift and estate tax exemption ($13.61 million per person for 2024).

Pros:

  • Simple and straightforward
  • Immediate benefit to the recipient
  • Ability to evaluate the beneficiary’s management and use of the gifted assets
  • No need for complex legal arrangements

Cons:

  • Loss of control over the gifted assets
  • Potential for a gift tax return if the annual exclusion is exceeded
  • Assets may be subject to creditors or poor financial decisions by the recipient

2. Intrafamily Loans and Loan Forgiveness

Intrafamily loans involve lending money to your children and charging interest at the applicable federal rate (“AFR”) – the minimum rate required between related parties.  In today’s interest rate environment, the AFR is significantly lower than what they would receive from a commercial lender.  Parents can also offer more favorable and flexible terms than commercial lenders, such as no downpayments, interest only loans, or extended payment periods.  Parents could later choose to forgive portions of the loan, effectively converting it into a gift.

Pros:

  • Lower interest rates than commercial loans
  • Flexibility in repayment terms
  • Can be structured to avoid gift tax implications initially

Cons:

  • Requires formal documentation and adherence to IRS rules to avoid being reclassified as a gift
  • Potential strain on family relationships if repayment becomes an issue
  • Interest income is taxable to the lender

3. Intentionally Defective Grantor Trust (“IDGT”)

An IDGT is an irrevocable trust that allows you to transfer assets out of your estate while retaining certain tax benefits. The trust is considered “defective” for income tax purposes because you, as the grantor, are still liable for the income tax on the trust’s earnings. This reduces the size of your taxable estate while allowing the trust assets to grow tax-free.  An IDGT can offer asset and creditor protection, while also servings as an effective prenuptial agreement for children, protecting their inheritance from potential future spouses without the awkwardness, hassle, and legal costs of negotiating with a child’s fiancée.

Pros:

  • Removes assets from your estate, reducing estate taxes
  • Allows for tax-free growth of trust assets
  • You pay income tax on IDGT earnings, further reducing your taxable estate

Cons:

  • Complex strategy that requires legal expertise to set up
  • Irrevocable, meaning you unable to amend, restate, or revoke the IDGT
  • You cannot reclaim the assets without consideration (or without adequate consideration) once transferred

4. Spousal Lifetime Access Trust (“SLAT”)

A non-reciprocal SLAT is an irrevocable trust where one spouse creates and funds a trust during their lifetime for the benefit of the other spouse and, potentially, children and grandchildren. The SLAT assets are removed from your estate, but the beneficiary spouse can still access the income and principal of the SLAT, providing you with indirect benefits. A SLAT works best for married couples who want to make significant lifetime gifts to children but have serious concerns about permanently giving away a significant portion of their assets that they may need later in life to maintain their lifestyle or to provide for their long-term care.

Pros:

  • Removes assets from your taxable estate
  • Provides financial support to the beneficiary spouse
  • Potential for significant estate tax savings

Cons:

  • Complex and requires careful planning and legal expertise
  • Irrevocable, limiting flexibility
  • If the beneficiary spouse dies, your indirect access to the SLAT may be lost

Conclusion

Choosing the right gifting strategy depends on your financial goals, the needs of your children, and your comfort with the complexity of each approach. Outright gifts and intrafamily loans offer simplicity and flexibility, making them ideal for more straightforward situations. For those with larger estates or more complex needs, IDGTs and SLATs provide advanced strategies to minimize taxes and protect assets. Consulting with an estate planning attorney can help you navigate these options and create a plan that best fits your family’s unique circumstances.